BARSS Analytics Research Report January 2026
BARSS Research • January 2026

Haiti Funding Sources and Misallocation Analysis

Where the Money Goes — and Where It Doesn't
θ = 0.86
Only 14 cents of every aid dollar reaches the Haitian frontline
0.86
USAID Haiti Theta
86% extracted before delivery
14%
Reaches Frontline
$14M per $100M disbursed
$13.34B
Committed (2010-2020)
Only $6.43B disbursed (48.2%)
6 homes
Red Cross Built
From $500M raised
$2B
PetroCaribe Embezzled
Zero prosecutions
BARSS Research Division | Wesley Bertil
Bertil's Analytics Research Sciences & Sorceries

9 Parts • EEDTM Framework Validation • 20+ Source Citations
Applying the Elite Extraction with Differential Targeting Model to humanitarian aid flows

Executive Summary

This report analyzes money flows into and through Haiti, documenting systematic extraction patterns that explain why decades of international aid have failed to produce sustainable development or democratic stability. The analysis reveals that election funding ($137M estimated) is a fraction of annual security, humanitarian, and aid spending, yet elections remain "materially impossible" due to lack of guaranteed funding.

Key Finding

Applying EEDTM analysis, we calculate a Theta of 0.86 for USAID Haiti aid (only 14% reaches local frontline), consistent with the extraction coefficient documented across 20 BARSS cases.

Whether through 1825 debt bondage, 2010 earthquake "aid," or 2025 security support, Haiti consistently experiences Theta ~0.80–0.86 extraction. The mechanism changes; the mathematics remain constant.

Part I

International Aid Commitments (2020–2026)

Billions committed, fractions disbursed

Total Aid Landscape

Period Total Committed Disbursed Disbursement Rate
2010–2020 Post-Earthquake $13.34 billion $6.43 billion 48.2%
FY2021–2024 US Only $1.1 billion Unknown
FY2024 USAID Haiti $368 million In progress Multiyear programs
Source: UN OCHA, CEPR, ForeignAssistance.gov

By Donor Country (Historical Recovery)

Donor Committed Disbursement Rate
Venezuela $1.34 billion 24%
United States $1.15 billion 30%
IDB $544 million 60%
IMF $311 million 95%
Spain $308 million 85%
EU $299 million 60%
Canada $289 million 91%
France $277 million 72%
Source: Office of Special Envoy for Haiti, CEPR

Recent US Aid (2022–2024)

Fiscal Year Bilateral Assistance Notes
FY2022 $237.4 million Biden Administration
FY2023 $204.5 million Increased HNP support
FY2024 $368 million obligated Multiyear contracts
Source: USAID, Congressional Research Service

Trump Administration Impact (2025–2026)

Funding Freeze: $330 million in outstanding commitments halted
Program Cuts: 80% of US-funded programs affected
Sectors Impacted: Food security, drinking water, primary healthcare, education, protection
Source: UN Report July 2025, Haitian Times
Part II

USAID Haiti Specifically

Following the dollar from Washington to Port-au-Prince
"Of every $100 million disbursed, $14 million reaches the people it was meant to help."

Budget Breakdown FY2024

Category Percentage Dollar Amount
Humanitarian Aid 40%+ $147M+
Health Programs 20%+ $74M+
Democracy/Governance ~10% ~$37M
Economic Growth ~15% ~$55M
Other ~15% ~$55M
Source: USASpending.gov, USAID OIG

Where USAID Money Actually Goes

56–66%
DC "Beltway" Contractors
$56–66M per $100M
18–26%
Secondary Contractors
$18–26M per $100M
0.9–3%
Direct to Haitian Orgs
$0.9–3M per $100M
~14%
Reaches Local Frontline
$14M per $100M
Recipient Type Percentage Per $100M
DC "Beltway" contractors 56–66% $56–66M
Secondary contractors 18–26% $18–26M
Direct to Haitian orgs 0.9–3% $0.9–3M
Reaches local frontline ~14% $14M
Source: CEPR "Where Does the Money Go?" 2021

Election/Democracy Support

Trump Administration Changes

USAID Presence: One rotating position by December 2024
Remote Management: US staff managing from United States
Staff Departures: At least one-third of local Haitian staff departed
Audit Initiated: December 2024 audit on monitoring practices
Source: USAID OIG, GAO-23-105211
Part III

UN Spending in Haiti

The least funded of the underfunded

BINUH (UN Integrated Office)

Metric Value
Annual Budget ~$50M (estimated)
Mandate Political mission, not peacekeeping
Staff Civilian personnel only

Multinational Security Support (MSS) Mission

Metric Value
Estimated Annual Need $600 million
Actually Pledged $84 million (initial)
Trust Fund Balance (May 2025) $110.9 million
US Pledge Total $300 million
Personnel (March 2025) ~1,000 (vs 2,500 planned)
Rubio Waiver (Feb 2025) $40 million allowed
Source: Security Council Report, CRS IN12331

Gang Suppression Force (October 2025)

UN Humanitarian Response

Year Requirement Funded Funding Rate
2024 $674 million ~$81M ~12%
2025 $880–908 million <$82M <9%
"Haiti remains the least funded of our underfunded country appeals globally."
— United Nations
Source: OCHA, ReliefWeb, UNICEF
Part IV

Security Spending Analysis

$720M+ per year in security, security worsening

Haiti Government Security Budget (2024–2025)

Institution Budget (Gourdes) Budget (USD)
Police (PNH) + Military Combined 30+ billion ~$230M
Armed Forces (FAd'H) 6.976 billion $52.9M
Ministry of Defense Total 7.9 billion ~$60M
Source: Le National, Haiti Budget Documents

FAd'H Budget Growth

Fiscal Year Budget (Gourdes) Budget (USD) % GDP GDP Used
2023–2024 1.272 billion $9.6M (at 132.5 HTG/USD) 0.06% $16B (World Bank 2023)
2024–2025 6.976 billion $52.9M (at 131.8 HTG/USD) 0.28% $19.1B (IMF est. 2024)
2025–2026 10.7 billion ~$82M (at ~130 HTG/USD) ~0.3% ~$20B (est.)
Note: USD conversions use BRH mid-rate for each fiscal year. GDP denominators from World Bank/IMF. The 5.5x budget increase (FY24 to FY25) is the relevant finding regardless of % GDP precision.
FAd'H budget grew 5.5x in one year (from $9.6M to $52.9M), yet security continues to deteriorate. The 2025–2026 projection of $82M would represent an 8.5x increase in two years.
Source: MacroTrends, Haiti Budget

International Security Support

Source Amount Status
US MSS Pledge $300 million Partial disbursement
US DOD Support $200 million Enabling support
Canada Trust Fund Primary contributor $110.9M in fund
Kenya Deployment In-kind ~400 officers

Security vs Election Spending Comparison

Category Annual Amount Notes
Haiti Gov Security $230M+ Police + Military
MSS Mission (needed) $600M Only $110M in fund
US Security Aid $300M pledged Partial disbursement
TOTAL SECURITY $1.13 billion/year If fully funded
Election Cost (CEP) $137 million One-time, unfunded
Key Insight

The cost of ONE election cycle ($137M) equals:

12% of total annual security spending needs ($137M / $1.13B)

23% of the MSS annual funding need ($137M / $600M)

46% of the US MSS pledge ($137M / $300M)

Part V

Misallocation and Corruption Data

Documented theft, zero accountability
"$2 billion embezzled. 14 soccer stadiums none completed. Zero prosecutions."

PetroCaribe Scandal (2008–2018)

$4.24B
Total Oil Received
$2B
Embezzled / Wasted
$2.1B
Debt to Venezuela
0
Prosecutions
Metric Amount
Total Oil Received $4.237 billion
Development Fund $1.738 billion
Embezzled/Wasted $2 billion
Debt to Venezuela $2.1 billion
2024 Settlement $500M paid, $1.69B forgiven

Named Officials

Failed Projects

Foreign Affairs Ministry: $14.7M contract, $10M paid
NEVER BUILT
Fort National Housing: $174M contract, $46M+ paid
UNFINISHED
14 Soccer Stadiums: $25.6M
NONE COMPLETED
Prosecutions: ZERO — despite court recommendations
Source: CSCCA Reports, Haiti Senate Report

CIRH / Clinton Reconstruction Commission

Metric Value
Total Funds Channeled $9.04 billion (Jan 2010–Jun 2012)
Total Disbursed ~$6.04 billion
To Haitian Government 9.6% of disbursed ($580M)
To Local Haitian Orgs 0.6% of disbursed ($36.2M)
To Non-Haitian Entities 89.8% of disbursed ($5.4 billion)
Final Report Submitted REFUSED
Note: Percentages are of disbursed amount (~$6.04B), not total channeled ($9.04B). The gap between channeled and disbursed is itself an extraction vector.
Source: Oxfam, Pulitzer Center, CEPR

American Red Cross Haiti

6
Homes Actually Built
Claimed 130,000
$500M
Raised from Donors
Unaccounted spending
$83M
Cost Per Home
$500M / 6 homes
25%
Actual Overhead
Claimed 9%
Claimed Actual
9% overhead 25% overhead
130,000 homes 6 homes built
$500M raised Unaccounted spending
Efficient delivery $83 million per home
Congressional Finding (Grassley Report):
• Red Cross does not know how much each project cost
• Spent 25% ($125M) on internal expenses
• "Complex yet inaccurate" accounting system
• Tried to terminate GAO audit
Source: ProPublica/NPR Investigation, Sen. Grassley Report

Clinton-Era Syndicate (BARSS Documented)

Defendant Mechanism Extraction
Clayton Homes Toxic product sale $1.5M+ contract
Chemonics Overhead extraction $175M+ total
Riceland Foods Subsidized dumping $554M subsidies
Sae-A Trading Public risk/private gain 80% public funding
Extraction Coefficient

θ = 0.80 (verified Sae-A case)

Source: BARSS Internal — Clinton-Era Syndicate: Humanitarian Extraction Forensic Audit

Transparency International

Metric Value
2024 CPI Score 16 out of 100
Ranking Among lowest in Americas
Comparison Nicaragua (14), Venezuela (10)
Global Average 43
Source: Transparency International CPI 2024
Part VI

Potential Funding Redirections

The money exists — the will does not

Current Spending That Could Be Reprioritized

Source Current Use Potential Reallocation
MSS Shortfall Fund Under-deployed security $50M to elections
USAID Democracy Programs Governance projects Direct CEP support
UN Humanitarian Gap 91% unfunded Reallocate 10%
FAd'H Budget Increase $43M increase in 1 year Election infrastructure

Donor Programs That Could Pivot

Program Current Budget Election Potential
USAID Democracy/Governance ~$37M/year Direct CEP funding
Canada Stabilization $110M+ contributed Electoral support
EU Caribbean Development Multi-million Democracy support
Japan Technical Assistance Active Electoral technology

Private Sector Contributions

Source Potential Mechanism
BAM BAM Oligarchs $1B+ combined wealth Mandatory contribution
Digicel Haiti $300M revenue Election fund levy
Remittance Companies Transaction fees Dedicated election fund
International Hotels Tourism recovery stake Democracy investment

Diaspora Remittances as Funding Source

$3.4–4.1B
Annual Remittances
World Bank 2023–2024
22–27%
% of GDP
Varies with measurement
1.5–2M
Diaspora Population
80.9%
Goes to Food
Metric Value
Annual Remittances $3.4–4.1 billion (World Bank 2023–2024; range reflects measurement methodology)
% of GDP 22–27% (varies with GDP estimate and remittance measurement)
Diaspora Population 1.5–2 million
Current Use 80.9% food

Potential Mechanisms

Source: World Bank, IOM, UNDP
Part VII

Cost-Benefit Analysis

$720M for security that fails vs $137M for elections that might work

Cost of Continued Instability

Metric Annual Cost
GDP Contraction (4.2% in FY2024) ~$800M lost output
Textile Job Losses (45%) $50M+ wages lost
Trade Deficit 15%+ of GDP
Displaced Persons (1.4M) Humanitarian burden
Brain Drain Incalculable
Six consecutive years of negative growth

Side-by-Side: Security Approach vs Elections

Cost of "Security" Approach
$720M+
• MSS Mission (1 year): $110M spent
• Haiti Police/Military: $230M/year
• US Security Aid: $380M pledged
RESULT:
90% of Port-au-Prince still gang-controlled
Security deteriorating
Violence increased
1,617 killed Q1 2025
Cost of Elections
$137M
• CEP Full Budget: $137 million
• First Round Only: ~$70 million
• Basic Infrastructure: ~$40 million
RETURN:
Legitimate government
Foreign direct investment unlocked
IMF/World Bank programs enabled
Diaspora investment confidence
The Math

Elections Cost: $137M (one-time)

Instability Cost: $800M+/year (ongoing)

Security Spending: $720M+/year (ineffective)

ROI: If elections enable even 10% recovery, benefit exceeds cost in Year 1

Part VIII — Framework Validation

EEDTM Analysis of Haiti Aid Flows

The extraction constant holds — even in humanitarian aid
"The mechanism changes; the mathematics remain constant."

Calculating Theta for Haiti Aid

Using the EEDTM (Elite Extraction with Differential Targeting Model):

USAID Haiti (Documented)

Flow Point Extraction Rate
DC Contractors 56–66% retained
Secondary Contractors 18–26% retained
Direct to Haiti 0.9–3%
Theta (θ) 0.86
θ = 1 − (Local Retention / Total Disbursement)
θ = 1 − (0.14 / 1.00) = 0.86

Comparison to BARSS Framework

Case Theta Mechanism
USAID Haiti 0.86 Contractor intermediation
Sae-A/Caracol 0.80 Public funding/private profit
Haiti 1825 0.86 Debt double heist
EEDTM Direct Average 0.85 Colonial/monopoly extraction
Key Finding

Haiti aid extraction (θ=0.86) matches the EEDTM direct extraction coefficient (θd=0.85), validating the framework across modern humanitarian aid flows.

Whether the mechanism is 19th-century debt bondage or 21st-century USAID contracting, the extraction rate converges on the same constant.

Who Captures the Extraction?

Recipient Capture Rate
US Contractors (Chemonics, etc.) 56–66%
International NGOs 15–25%
UN/Multilateral Overhead 5–10%
Local Elite Partners 3–5%
Beneficiaries 9–14%

The "Aid Theta" Framework

Proposed New Metric: Aid Theta (θa) = Percentage of aid captured by non-beneficiary intermediaries

Aid Channel Aid Theta Effective Delivery
GiveDirectly 0.15 84.8%
Direct Implementers 0.25–0.35 65–75%
Foundation Average 0.40–0.50 50–60%
University Grants 0.40–0.70 30–60%
USAID Haiti 0.86 14%

Implications for Election Funding

If $137M were allocated for elections through standard aid channels:

Theta Applied Reaches Election Infrastructure Lost to Intermediaries
Theta 0.86 (USAID standard) $19.2M $117.8M
Theta 0.50 (Foundation average) $68.5M $68.5M
Theta 0.15 (GiveDirectly model) $116.5M $20.5M
Recommendation: Any election funding must bypass high-Theta intermediaries and flow through verified low-extraction channels.
Part IX

Conclusions and Recommendations

Breaking the extraction pattern

Summary of Findings

1. Haiti receives substantial aid commitments ($1.1B US alone FY2021–2024), but disbursement rates are low (48–60%)

2. Of disbursed funds, 86% is extracted before reaching beneficiaries (USAID documented)

3. Security spending dominates ($720M+/year) while elections remain unfunded ($137M needed)

4. Corruption is documented but unprosecuted (PetroCaribe $2B, zero prosecutions)

5. Election cost equals 19% of annual security spending yet is described as "materially impossible"

6. Diaspora remittances ($3.4–4.1B) dwarf all foreign aid combined but remain untapped for development

Recommended Funding Redirections

Source Action Amount
MSS Trust Fund Reallocate 20% $22M
USAID Democracy Direct CEP grant $37M
Canada Stabilization Election earmark $25M
Diaspora Bond Launch program $50M
Oligarch Contribution Mandatory levy $10M
TOTAL $144M

The Core Argument

Current Logic
"We cannot have elections until we have security."
Result: $720M+ spent on security
Security worsening
No elections
Alternative Logic
"We cannot have security until we have legitimate government."
Implication: $137M in elections
May be more effective than $720M in security
Break the cycle
"Whether through 1825 debt bondage, 2010 earthquake 'aid,' or 2025 security support, Haiti consistently experiences Theta ~0.80–0.86 extraction. The mechanism changes; the mathematics remain constant."
Breaking the Pattern

Election funding that bypasses high-Theta intermediaries could be the first transfer to Haiti where majority value reaches intended recipients.

Sources

Government / Multilateral

Research / Think Tanks

Journalism

BARSS Internal